UPDATED: 09-19-26 13:31 PDT

hoop UTSA
  
UTSA                  
W-L: ( 2- 1) PR = 83.2867

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 905 H UT Rio Grande Valley 45- 16 912 A Texas St. ( 1- 3, 83.4) 30- 26 919 A Texas ( 3- 0, 95.7) 6- 30 926 H Colorado St ( 2- 1, 84.3) 1003 A Rice ( 1- 2, 81.3) 1008 H So. Florida ( 3- 0, 91.6) 1017 H Navy ( 1- 1, 80.5) 1024 A Tulane ( 1- 2, 82.6) 1105 A Fl. Atlantic ( 2- 1, 85.6) 1114 H No. Texas ( 1- 2, 81.0) 1121 A UAB ( 1- 2, 79.4) 1128 H Tulsa ( 3- 0, 92.9)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   912 A Texas St.              30-26       4    -1    ++     5.13
   919 A Texas                   6-30     -24   -13          -1.59

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   912 A Texas St.              30-26       4    -1    ++     5.13

UTSA Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Boston Col UTSA   UTSA
California UTSA   UTSA
Clemson Clemson   Clemson
Duke Duke   Duke
Florida St Florida St   Florida St
Georgia Tech UTSA   UTSA
Louisville Louisville   Louisville
Miami Miami   Miami
No. Carolina No. Carolina   No. Carolina
NC State UTSA   UTSA
Pittsburgh Pittsburgh   Pittsburgh
SMU SMU   SMU
Stanford UTSA   UTSA
Syracuse UTSA   UTSA
Virginia Virginia   Virginia
Va. Tech Va. Tech   Va. Tech
Wake Forest Wake Forest   Wake Forest
Army Army   Army
Charlotte UTSA   UTSA
Ea. Carolina UTSA   UTSA
Fl. Atlantic Fl. Atlantic   Fl. Atlantic
Memphis UTSA   UTSA
Navy UTSA   UTSA
No. Texas UTSA insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) UTSA
Rice UTSA   UTSA
So. Florida So. Florida   So. Florida
Temple UTSA   UTSA
Tulane UTSA   UTSA
Tulsa Tulsa   Tulsa
UAB UTSA   UTSA
Arizona UTSA   UTSA
Arizona St UTSA   UTSA
BYU BYU   BYU
Baylor Baylor   Baylor
Cincinnati Cincinnati   Cincinnati
Colorado UTSA   UTSA
Houston Houston   Houston
Iowa State Iowa State   Iowa State
Kansas UTSA   UTSA
Kansas St Kansas St   Kansas St
Oklahoma St Oklahoma St   Oklahoma St
TCU TCU   TCU
Texas Tech Texas Tech   Texas Tech
UCF UCF   UCF
Utah Utah   Utah
We. Virginia We. Virginia   We. Virginia
Illinois Illinois   Illinois
Indiana Indiana   Indiana
Iowa Iowa   Iowa
Maryland Maryland   Maryland
Michigan Michigan   Michigan
Michigan St Michigan St   Michigan St
Minnesota Minnesota   Minnesota
Nebraska Nebraska   Nebraska
Northwestern Northwestern   Northwestern
Ohio State Ohio State tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Ohio State
Oregon Oregon   Oregon
Penn State Penn State   Penn State
Purdue Purdue   Purdue
Rutgers UTSA   UTSA
UCLA UCLA   UCLA
USC USC   USC
Washington Washington   Washington
Wisconsin Wisconsin   Wisconsin
Florida Int UTSA   UTSA
J'ville St J'ville St   J'ville St
Kennesaw St UTSA   UTSA
Liberty Liberty   Liberty
La. Tech UTSA   UTSA
Mid. Tenn. Mid. Tenn.   Mid. Tenn.
N. Mexico St UTSA   UTSA
Sam Houston Sam Houston   Sam Houston
UTEP UTSA   UTSA
We. Kentucky UTSA   UTSA
Mass. Mass.   Mass.
Notre Dame Notre Dame   Notre Dame
UConn UTSA   UTSA
Akron UTSA   UTSA
Ball State UTSA   UTSA
Bowl'g Green UTSA   UTSA
Buffalo UTSA   UTSA
Ce. Michigan UTSA   UTSA
Ea. Michigan UTSA   UTSA
Kent St UTSA   UTSA
Miami (OH) UTSA   UTSA
No. Illinois UTSA   UTSA
Ohio UTSA   UTSA
Toledo UTSA   UTSA
We. Michigan We. Michigan   We. Michigan
Air Force Air Force   Air Force
Boise St Boise St   Boise St
Colorado St Colorado St   Colorado St
Fresno St UTSA   UTSA
Hawai'i UTSA   UTSA
Nevada Nevada   Nevada
New Mexico New Mexico   New Mexico
San Diego St UTSA   UTSA
San Jose St UTSA   UTSA
UNLV UTSA   UTSA
Utah St UTSA   UTSA
Wyoming UTSA   UTSA
Oregon St UTSA   UTSA
Wash. St UTSA   UTSA
Alabama Alabama   Alabama
Arkansas UTSA   UTSA
Auburn Auburn   Auburn
Florida Florida   Florida
Georgia Georgia tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Georgia
Kentucky Kentucky   Kentucky
LSU LSU   LSU
Missouri Missouri   Missouri
Miss. St Miss. St   Miss. St
Oklahoma Oklahoma   Oklahoma
Ole Miss Ole Miss   Ole Miss
So. Carolina So. Carolina   So. Carolina
Tennessee Tennessee   Tennessee
Texas Texas Texas  
Texas A&M Texas A&M   Texas A&M
Vanderbilt Vanderbilt   Vanderbilt
App State App State   App State
Arkansas St UTSA   UTSA
Coastal Car. UTSA   UTSA
Georgia So. UTSA   UTSA
Georgia St Georgia St   Georgia St
J. Madison J. Madison   J. Madison
Louisiana Louisiana   Louisiana
Marshall Marshall   Marshall
Old Dominion UTSA   UTSA
So. Miss UTSA   UTSA
So. Alabama UTSA   UTSA
Texas St. UTSA UTSA  
Troy Troy   Troy
UL Monroe UTSA   UTSA
Delaware Delaware   Delaware
Missouri St UTSA   UTSA

PowerWise = 57


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 2.93

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   1 A Texas St.       ( 1- 3, 83.4)    30-26      -16.48      12.25       1.00         1.46            38.79
   1 A Texas           ( 3- 0, 95.7)     6-30       -4.20      24.53       1.00         1.46            -2.34
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        36.44

winning pts = 38.7852 losing points = -2.3409

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------